Why is it not smart to use AI for explaining the content of a signed contract

Interpretations and Nuances

There are several reasons why it would not be smart to use artificial intelligence (AI) to explain the content of a contract.

First and foremost, the legal profession relies heavily on the interpretation and application of the law, which is a highly complex and nuanced field. Contracts, in particular, are often filled with legal jargon and technical terms that can be difficult for even experienced lawyers to understand. It is therefore unlikely that an AI system would be able to provide a comprehensive and accurate explanation of the content of a contract without a thorough understanding of the applicable laws and legal principles.

Mochadocs - Contract Management - Horizontal - AI Servers V3

Incomplete

The interpretation of contracts often involves the application of case law, which refers to the decisions made by courts in similar cases. These decisions can have a significant impact on the interpretation of a contract and are an essential part of the legal process. However, AI systems do not have the ability to access or understand case law, which means that they would be unable to provide a complete and accurate explanation of the content of a contract.

Highly specific to the parties involved

Contracts are often highly specific to the parties involved and the context in which they were created. This means that a contract that is clear and straightforward in one situation may be confusing or ambiguous in another. An AI system would not be able to take into account the specific circumstances surrounding a contract and may therefore provide an inadequate or misleading explanation of its content.

Different understandings

Contracts are often open to negotiation and interpretation. This means that the parties to a contract may have different understandings of its terms and provisions. An AI system would not be able to account for these differing perspectives and may therefore provide an explanation that is not reflective of the parties' understanding of the contract.

Ethical concerns

There are also ethical concerns associated with using AI to explain the content of a contract. The use of AI in the legal field raises questions about the role of lawyers and the potential for automation to replace human expertise. Some critics argue that the use of AI in the legal profession could lead to a loss of jobs and a decline in the quality of legal services.

Risky and potentially ineffective

While it may be tempting to use AI to explain the content of a contract, the complexities of the legal profession and the potential ethical concerns make it a risky and potentially ineffective approach. It is likely that a human lawyer with a thorough understanding of the applicable laws and legal principles would be better equipped to provide a comprehensive and accurate explanation of the content of a contract.

Why is it not smart to use AI for explaining the content of a signed contract?